Exclusive: Nations about to Lose Sovereignty over their own Citizens | How will Ministers & Telecom Regulators Mitigate Becoming Obsolete in 2021?

Survivability News Exclusive Feature.

In an ultra-strategic move to dominate data from the heavens, Starlink has already launched hundreds of satellites to deliver Space-based broadband services to all of US and Canada by early 2021, and 12,000 satellites to cover the entire planet by end of 2021. This unprecedented game changer will enable Starlink and others to offer broadband and other services from space to people all over the world without any licence or permission from their nations or regulators.

Survivability News Exclusive Feature: 

Elon Musk’s Starlink vision to dominate the Internet broadband sector for decades to come by offering broadband services to consumers worldwide, from space, became a reality in 2020.

In an ultra-strategic move to dominate data from the heavens, hundreds of satellites have already been launched by Starlink to deliver broadband services to all of US and Canada by early 2021. They are on track to reach the goal of deploying a constellation of 12,000 Low Earth Orbit satellites (LEO) by the end of 2021, which will cover the entire planet. This unprecedented move will enable Starlink to offer its broadband services from space to people all over the world – unhindered, unobstructed, unchecked or regulated by nations, their ministries or regulators.

A Game Changer for Generations to Come.

Starlink’s visionary plan will undoubtedly allow them to globally dominate the sector by revolutionizing the broadband sector and its service delivery modality today and for the 21st century.

On this, MLi Group chairman and Survivability News publisher Khaled Fattal said: “This new reality stands to challenge, disrupt and threaten all previously known norms and protocols that had been followed by national governments, their telecom ministries and regulatory agencies around the world”.

Fattal later added: “In the blink of a technology-eye, it will forever alter the models and frameworks these governments relied upon and operated under that kept them relevant and in charge. They are about to be imminently rendered unable or incapable of regulating, enforcing, managing, or holding to account new service providers offering broadband and other services from space to their own citizens – in their own sovereign nations.” 

Musk’s SpaceX looks to rule space with 30,000 more satellites. Its Starlink’s internet service could eventually dwarf the total number of satellites ever launched.

But Musk is not the only man with this plan. UK-Indian venture OneWeb and Amazon’s Project Kuiper are just two other serious players entering this “space.” All are aiming to establish themselves as the global  “Zeus” of Space-Based broadband.

Fattal added: “This new reality creates unprecedented national sovereignty, survivability, security, and Geo-Poli-Cyber threat vectors on nation states and governments all over the world. Losing sovereignty over your own citizens in the short term means losing the mitigation battle in the medium and long term. This may prove national leaders’ greatest challenge this decade. This is partly because the tools and know-how needed to successfully mitigate this existential sovereignty threat requires new and equally unprecedented Mind-sets, strategies and solutions.”

This new direction is a global game changer. In and of itself, the sheer baldness, size, and magnitude of Musk’s new galactic pet project is eye popping. But what ought to capture your attention is that the single regulatory authority Starlink sought approval from was the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This should raise questions as to Starlink’s relationship not only with the FCC, but with the US government as well.

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, U.S. Air Force General Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy pose for a photo in the command’s headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colorado, April 15, 2019. Image released by the United States Air Force.

The FCC also approved subsidies for Starlink to the tune of nearly $900 million over the next ten years, for deploying broadband services in “rural” and “underserved” areas.

Noteworthy is that Musk’s SpaceX company already has billions of dollars’ worth in contracts with NASA and the US government. in fact, Musk may have single handedly saved NASA’s space program and the US reputation being a global space leader with his SpaceX reusable rockets.

Therefore, it is very fair to say that Musk’s Starlink not only enjoys the tacit and proactive blessings of past and future US governments on this bold move, but he may also have been their hand-picked candidate to push this 21st century Space-Broadband agenda forward.

Also worth noting, across the Atlantic Ocean, OneWeb, which had previously filed for bankruptcy, got bailed out by none other than the UK government, the US “special” ally, to the tune of $1 billion. OneWeb is now  moving forward with plans for their own LEO satellite fleet, albeit significantly smaller in size.

This means the west has two US and one UK companies ready to dominate, perhaps own, the broadband heavens for the foreseeable future.

Fattal concluded by saying: “Today’s early beginnings of space-based broadband remind me of the early days of the internet in the US (the white House) in mid-90s and how it propelled the US to dominate data,  information, innovation, and the digital economy for the next 25 years. The only exception is back then no-one envisaged having even a few hundred million internet users, let alone 3.5 billion, nor any of the achieved successes. I am in no doubt that the unpublished vision of this initiative may contain helping the US government advance its geopolitical agendas to influence future events and narratives. This will certainly create a new race  between the superpowers with new risk vectors and dimensions that no side can afford to lose.”

Nations Losing Sovereignty over their Citizens.

The ramifications on the national sovereignty of nations all over the world is unprecedented. As it stands, no nation, minister or regulator can prevent Starlink or other space-based broadband service providers from offering their services to their citizens from space. Nor can they make these providers comply to any regulatory requirements pertaining to privacy, pricing, etc. To date, Survivability News research has been unsuccessful to ascertain what Starlink’s approach to privacy, whether it will be local, regional, or global. No clarity has been determined yet as its international pricing strategies or other policies will be. While Survivability News did reach out to Starlink for a comment in advance of this publication, no reply has been received yet.

Beyond regulating the results of this feat, we should also consider the implications for current local and regional telecom and broadband service providers, as well as the possibility of Musk inheriting far too much power across the internet and the heavens itself.

Moving Forward

National and government leaders, telecom & defence ministers, regulators & national security advisors, as well as telecom and broadband operators, need to take notice of all these critical developments and ask themselves challenging and uncomfortable questions, such as:

  1. What impact will this have on sovereign nations being able/unable to regulate and protect their citizens?
  2. How will this impact the individual and collective privacy of their citizens once data is collected by space-based broadband providers?
  3. What and whose privacy policy will be followed? (Will it be global, like Facebook, or localized?)
  4. What new extensions of strategic Geo-Political influence and power will this conjure for the US and UK to expand the breadth of their empires in the 21st century?
  5. What is at stake for Russia and China?
  6. How will they respond?
  7. How ready is my nation to respond?
  8. With the Geo-Poli-Cyber warfare that is already engulfing the world unmitigated, what new complications will this add to our national survivability and security chessboard?
  9. How will national leaders, ministers and regulators act be being caught between the US and China titan empires, yet again?
  10. What will be the impact and mitigation strategies of existing telecom and broadband service providers who invested 100s of millions or billions of $ for licenses to operate from regulators in each country who now must compete against a provider who paid zero?
  11. Will the $900 Million FCC subsidies to help “rural” and “underserved” areas require Starlink and other space-based broadband providers to also champion and promote ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ to citizens around the world?
  12. Can nations exert their territorial integrity over “space” spanning their sovereign and physical jurisdictions? How?
  13. How will they defend their sovereign “space”?
  14. What Defence Strategies will they follow?
  15. Are the United Nations and its International Telecommunication Union (ITU) capable of playing a relevant and effective role on any of these topics? Which? How?

Call To Action

Decision makers who wish to confidentially learn more on these matters and become better aware of possible short to long term mitigation strategies can get in touch by submitting their expression of interest below.

Click to SUBMIT YOUR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST

Survivability News Starlink Special Event

Survivability News is organizing a Round Table Private Briefing special event on this topic in the coming weeks.

Attendance and participation are by registration and subsequent approval, or by MLi Group, Survivability News, or participating partners’ and collaborating organizations’ invitation only.

Details will be announced shortly. Subscribe for to stay up to date.

Watch Starlink’s and Falcon launch below.


Are you Citizen-Journalist Material?

Have a tip or scoop? Do you have info about corruption that needs to be investigated and responsibly exposed ? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp at +44 7771 927378 | Signal at +447766 098270


Receive Exclusives, Features & News Updates

Subscribe



What Are
Geo-Poli-
Cyber™ Risks?

What Is Geo-Poli-Cyber™?

MLi Group created the terms Poli-Cyber™ and Geo-Poli-Cyber™ (GPC™) in 2012 and 2013 based on the philosophy that if you cannot identify and name the threat, you cannot mitigate that threat.

Geo-Poli-Cyber™ attacks are political, ideological, terrorist, extremist, ‘religious’, and/or geo-politically motivated.

More Sinister Than Financial Motivations

Geo-Poli-Cyber™ attacks are significantly different from financially motivated cyber-attacks in damage, scale, magnitude as well as in risk mitigation strategies and solutions.

Click to read more