Exclusive – Why did ITV Doctor Out of it’s UK Aired Version Harry’s ‘Super-Bombshell’ clip about Queen/Firm Advisors? | Clip Appeared in original CBS Megan-Harry-Oprah Interview. Who is ITV Protecting? Video

By ITV's doctoring their aired version they may have exposed some Shadowy Palace Characters and Advisors to the Queen and possibly exposed ITV executives' attempt to protect them?

Oprah’s CBS exclusive interview of Megan and Harry and the bombshell revelations unquestionably exposed possible institutional racism inside the British Palace that require answers.

But more concerning is ITV’s action to cut out of its UK aired version the super bombshell below spoken by Harry himself. The clip exposes shadowy Palace characters who ‘Advise’ the Queen and protect the “Firm” and the very “Institution of the Monarchy”.

11 Million UK viewers would have expected to be watching the interview that aired on Monday night in the UK to be similar or identical to the one that aired by CBS Sunday night across the US. And they would have been right in their expectations. But this is not what happened. in fact, the majority if not all of UK viewers would not have noticed or realised this vital omission.

In defence of ITV, it is not unusual for subsequent networks who re-air interviews in other counties or jurisdiction to edit or cut out some parts. Such practice is common, especially if they have limited air-time allocation or if the edit or omission of said content would not reduce the relevance of the aggregate of the report nor compromise the journalistic integrity of the final cut.

Clearly, such conditions do not apply on the Oprah Megan and Harry interview which can be classified as a world exclusive bombshell interview. In fact, the very removal of a clip where Prince Harry himself reveals explosive clip insides about  “Queen/Firm Advisors”  (watch below), may prove perhaps prove even more damaging than the “Baby Skin Colour Concern” reference. It also raises more new questions that expose an even bigger cancer inside the institution. Question that requires the palace to address and offer answers to the public if the palace’s damage limitation exercise is to have any success.

Invisible hands of shadowy characters may have been involved in manipulating the queen and other royals,under the narrative of “Protecting the Institution” and “the Monarchy”. This may prove too damaging to the standing of the Queen as the monarch over 3 Billion commonwealth citizens, many of whom are in African citizens.

Watch the less than one minute part of the interview that ITV intentionally cut out and  kept it away from the 11 Million UK viewers and the British public at large. Then consider its super bombshell value, its implications, and repercussions on who runs the palace, Th queen or shadowy  “Advisors”. Then consider how their roles and involvements appear to have manipulated the queen, other royals, and Megan and Harry.

Then ask yourself these questions:

  • Who is/are this/these advisors?
  • Who is the ITV decision maker/executive that had the authority on what to take out and air?
  • Did “Queen Advisor(s)” put any direct or indirect influence on ITV and/or its executives to remove this one minute part of the interview?
  • Shouldn’t this unnerving revelation about “Queen/Palace Advisors” also be fully and publicly investigated, just as the “Baby Skin Colour Concern” ought to be?

Unfolding story.   More updates to follow.


Are you Citizen-Journalist Material?

Have a tip or scoop? Do you have info about corruption that needs to be investigated and responsibly exposed ? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp at +44 7771 927378 | Signal at +447766 098270


Receive Exclusives, Features & News Updates

Subscribe



What Are
Geo-Poli-
Cyber™ Risks?

What Is Geo-Poli-Cyber™?

MLi Group created the terms Poli-Cyber™ and Geo-Poli-Cyber™ (GPC™) in 2012 and 2013 based on the philosophy that if you cannot identify and name the threat, you cannot mitigate that threat.

Geo-Poli-Cyber™ attacks are political, ideological, terrorist, extremist, ‘religious’, and/or geo-politically motivated.

More Sinister Than Financial Motivations

Geo-Poli-Cyber™ attacks are significantly different from financially motivated cyber-attacks in damage, scale, magnitude as well as in risk mitigation strategies and solutions.

Click to read more