Exclusive: President Trump is Blindsided by UN’s AI Direction Unaware His & Administration’s Compromise Originated from a Senior Inner Cabinet Member’s Office. (Part I) | Survivability News Exclusive Investigative Report.

Survivability News Exclusive Special Report:

President Trump’s unhappiness with the United Nations is nothing new and can be traced back to his first Presidential term. However, this latest rift and escalation between President Trump and the United Nations is very different and highly significant.

In his second term. President Trump had anchored his vision and his administration’s strategic plans on leveraging American Artificial Intelligence (AI) breakthrough developments to help “Make America Great Again”.

The President has always believed that to achieve this, American AI companies must not be shackled down by regulation that can stifle their progress to innovate. Instead, the President believed that empowering American AI companies to push forward unrestricted by regulation is fundamental.

Another key objective was to advance his own legacy. Part of the President’s legacy plans is to be seen now and for decades to come as the President who took the USA to unprecedented and great new heights, and as the founding father of 21st Century America.

Trump Blindedsided from Within

President Trump’s AI plan has been to achieve “American AI Global Supremacy”. This is reflected by the Whitehouse and the Trump Administration 2025 publication titled: “Winning the Race, America’s AI action Plan”.  

To achieve this the President set an AI Strategy to beat China and the other AI competitors around the world. However, his plans got compromised from within by people in the office of one of his own inner cabinet team. The compromise happened by enabling or shutting a blind eye to other American(s) who were directly assisting the UN in formulating its 40-member AI panel that dismayed President Trump.

Trump’s American AI Global Supremacy Sabotaged by Trusted Americans

It appears that President Trump’s vision and strategic plans seemed to have been blindsided and compromised from within his inner circle, in particular from the office of a senior member of his inner cabinet which the Survivability News investigative team have been able to ascertain with confidence from highly reliable and confidential sources.  

President Trump has fired cabinet members who were loyal to him. Just consider what he will do to those who Betray him.

Background & How Did Things Get Here?

In 2025, the Trump administration fiercely opposed UN efforts to create any global AI governance advocating for national sovereignty and technological autonomy instead. The Trump administration opposed centralized international control or governance of AI through the United Nations or its UN family members. At the UN, Trump’s officials argued that AI governance should preserve national sovereignty and technological independence, rather than place AI under centralized international control.

Recently, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres announced the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence. Its mandate was to examine AI risks, opportunities, and possible international governance mechanisms. Guterres specifically warned that malicious AI could undermine institutions, social cohesion, and democracy.

However, in February 2026, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres announced a new 40-member Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, established pursuant to the UN’s Pact for the Future. Guterres described it as the first fully independent global scientific body dedicated to assessing AI’s impacts, risks and opportunities.

Then in early August 2026, the United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres announced the work of the Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence, a newly established global body of 40 leading scientists and experts from every region.

The US Trump administration subsequently opposed the UN panel, with the objections focused on concerns about UN mission creep, overreach, and the role of authoritarian states, and identified the selection process itself as a concern. The General Assembly nevertheless approved it 117–2, with two abstentions.

Through its confidential sources, Survivability News special investigators have been able to ascertain that the new UN AI direction and the formation of its UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres 40-member team which blindsided President Trump was directly assisted and enabled by either an advisor / staffer in the office of a senior Trump cabinet member, or the senior cabinet member themselves.

What Part II of this Survivability News Exclusive Investigative Report Will Address?

In Part II of this Survivability News Exclusive Investigative Report, our investigative journalists will dig deeper into who and how President Trump was blindsided from within, and answering these and other questions:

  • Who was involved in assisting UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres form his UN AI Governance, and how are they connected to the office of a senior Trump inner cabinet team member that Blindsided President Trump?
  • In addition to the senior Trump inner cabinet team member’s office compromise of President Trump’s AI Policy Strategy, who else was involved in assisting UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres assemble his 40-member Independent International Scientific Panel on AI? 
  • Who blindsided and compromised President Trump’s AI Policy Strategy – an advisor/staffer in the office of that Senior Trump Cabinet Member, or the Cabinet Member themselves

Are you Citizen-Journalist Material?

Have a tip or scoop? Do you have info about corruption that needs to be investigated and responsibly exposed ? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp at +1 (310) 429-1585 | Signal at +447766 098270


Receive Exclusives, Features & News Updates

Subscribe



What Are
Geo-Poli-
Cyber™ Risks?

What Is Geo-Poli-Cyber™?

MLi Group created the terms Poli-Cyber™ and Geo-Poli-Cyber™ (GPC™) in 2012 and 2013 based on the philosophy that if you cannot identify and name the threat, you cannot mitigate that threat.

Geo-Poli-Cyber™ attacks are political, ideological, terrorist, extremist, ‘religious’, and/or geo-politically motivated.

Click to read more